What you say sounds a bit old-fashioned, but this list is partially old-fashioned so it's ok:) There is RFC 2919 (from 2001) that describes the "List-Id" header. It was set even by my old majordomo list manager. Most of todays mailing lists set this header. Filtering should be based on this header, not on the "To:" field. There's also a "Precedence:" header that marks the email as coming from a list. Anyway, as long as no one complains, I will leave the headers as they are now. It worked for years with majordomo. Thanks for the feedback! Regards Uz On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 05:03:52PM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 10:37:16PM +0100, Ullrich von Bassewitz wrote: > > > > You are welcome! > > > > I've changed the configuration so that the original "To:" header is now > > preserved. Will check when this mail comes back via the list. According to the > > mlmmj docs this is not the recommended behavior. Is there any reason you need > > the old behavior? > > That works, thanks! > > Any email addressed only to me is flagged in my mail reader. Because it > is probably something that requires my immediate attention. If now mailing > lists start to do this rewriting this will no longer stand out. > > Rewriting emails makes it impossible to make a mailing list archive > from a subscriber account, since the email is different for every > subscriber. This also makes it impossible to just import emails if > you missed some, as well. Etc. > > Rewriting emails is just bad. Don't do it. Who is recommending that?! > > > Segher -- Ullrich von Bassewitz uz@musoftware.de Encrypted email preferred PGP Key-Id: 29D93B10Received on 2018-03-14 22:57:49
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.